February 19, 2003

Counterpoint:

Thomas Friedman believes the Bush administration is being less-than-truthful, and says so in today's New York Times

I am also very troubled by the way Bush officials have tried to justify this war on the grounds that Saddam is allied with Osama bin Laden or will be soon. There is simply no proof of that, and every time I hear them repeat it I think of the Gulf of Tonkin resolution. You don't take the country to war on the wings of a lie.

Tell people the truth. Saddam does not threaten us today. He can be deterred. Taking him out is a war of choice but it's a legitimate choice. It's because he is undermining the U.N., it's because if left alone he will seek weapons that will threaten all his neighbors, it's because you believe the people of Iraq deserve to be liberated from his tyranny, and it's because you intend to help Iraqis create a progressive state that could stimulate reform in the Arab/Muslim world, so that this region won't keep churning out angry young people who are attracted to radical Islam and are the real weapons of mass destruction.

Thanks to Carolynne for the tip.

UPDATE: Andrew Sullivan offers his two cents on the Friedman op/ed.

Posted by Avocare at February 19, 2003 08:47 AM
Comments
Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)


Remember me?


This site Copyright ALN

Site design inspired by Scott Yang

Email: avocare at avocare dot net